By Israel Shamir (an Israeli
writer and journalist living in Jaffa.
The great slaughter of
innocents is imminent. Very soon, hundreds of thousands, if not millions of our
brothers by Adam and Eve will be strafed, napalmed, and nuked. Boys and girls,
unborn babes and old men will be brought to the altar of Vengeance and ritually
slaughtered by the High Priest of that God, President George W. Bush. The time
is aptly chosen, and it is hardly a coincidence. The ten days after Rosh
Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, are called the Days of Trepidation, all the way
to the tenth day, Yom HaDin, the Doomsday.
President Bush called his
enterprise, Crusade. This title invokes in our memory the dour knights of
Aquitaine and pious Frankish warriors, who took Cross and with the name of Our
Lady on their lips ventured into a long and hard pilgrimage. Reality was worse.
The Crusade was a Western Jihad and it caused a lot of bloodshed. The Crusaders
were wild and unruly, they sacked the most beautiful Christian city on earth,
Constantinople, and they drenched in blood the holy ground of Jerusalem. A
Crusader chronicler Radulf of Caen, wrote of his comrades-at-arms, in the Syrian
city of Maarra, 'they impaled babies on spits, grilled and devoured them'. They
were rough folk, and still I would like to save the name of these killers and
cannibals from being besmirched by association with G.W. Bush' Crusade.
They never went after revenge,
this most un-Christian, even anti-Christian feeling. The very essence of
Christ's Gospel was the rejection of revenge. That was the great difference
between the Church and the Synagogue, these two sisters born two thousand years
ago. This difference is built in, it is the inherent most prominent feature of
the gap between the two faiths: while Christians are called to pray for their
enemies, Jews dream of vengeance.
In the intended ideological
confusion of last century, Christians are taught to think that the Jews wait for
Messiah who is Christ. Christianity teaches that He came and will come again,
while Judaism considers the Messiah did not come yet, that is all the difference
according to the teaching of Judeo-Christianity. But reality is vastly
different: Christ came to save, while Messiah comes to take revenge. It was
proven by the brilliant Israeli scholar, Prof. Israel Jacob Yuval of Hebrew
University in his new book, Two Nations In Your Womb[i]. 'Vengeful salvation',
as Yuval called it, was adopted by the European Jews from the old Pharisee
sources and became the prevailing doctrine of the Synagogue.
When Dr Israel Yuval published
his insightful book on theology of vengeance in Judaism, it was accepted with
great enthusiasm by his Israeli colleagues, but the American Jewish scholars
hated it. Dr Ezra Fleischer wrote a vehement critique, concluding it with the
words: 'It would be better if such a book would not be printed, but if it was
printed, it should be sentenced to oblivion'.
Prof. Yuval quotes many
ancient Jewish texts proving this point. "In the End of the days when the
Messiah comes) God will destroy, kill and exterminate all the nations but the
sons of Israel", written in the Sefer Nitzahon Yashan, written by a German
Jew in 13th c. A liturgical poet Klonimus b. Judah had a vision of 'God's hands
full of Goys' corpses'.
Even more dreadful dreams of
blood and destruction precede the first attacks on Jews in the end of 11th
century. A hundred years before the Crusaders' onslaught on Jews, R. Simon b.
Yitzhak calls on God 'to take His sword and slaughter the Gentiles'. In order to
hasten the destruction of Gentiles, the sages of Europe adopted curses against
Christians and Christ, and introduced them into liturgy of Passover, Doomsday
and even the daily prayer.
That is why the decision of
President Bush to embark of the campaign of revenge is not a Christian act. One
could argue that the President and his administration are manipulated by the
Jews, who dream of vengeance. Not in vain, immediately after Wall Street was hit
by kamikaze, Bibi Nataniyahu said 'It is very good for us'[ii]. Not in vain,
Ariel Sharon tried to compare Palestinians to Osama b. Laden. Not in vain,
Israelis demand destruction of Baghdad and Teheran, of Korea and Sudan, of
everybody who is not taking orders from Tel Aviv or Washington.
A mystic would not call it
'manipulation', but would accept for its face value the arrival of Messiah of
Vengeance in the unlikely figure of G.W. Bush. The Messiah of Vengeance has
actually a different name in Christian theology. He is called Antichrist.
The Christian theologians
tried to delve in the qualities of this apocalyptic figure. St John of Damascus
prophesied, 'antichrist will come to Jews and for Jews, against Christ and
Christians'. (John the Damascene was a friend of Islam and he explained Muslim
dogma of eternal Koran as a form of the Christian teaching of Logos). Church
Fathers considered the Rise of Antichrist as the rise and temporary triumph of
Judaism. In 10 c., St Andrew the Byzantine prophesied, 'The kingdom of Israel
will be restored and it will become the launching pad of Antichrist'.
This proximity of Israel to
Apocalypse is felt by millions of devout Christians in the United States. They
learned that the rise of Antichrist is the stage on the way to the Second
Coming. But, being misled by their pastors, they draw a paradoxical conclusion
and decided to side with Antichrist. They forgot the words, 'the Son of Man will
go as it has been decreed, but woe to that man' who sides with Antichrist.
There are two days of the
Jewish calendar especially suitable for the vengeance. One of them is Purim, the
day, when according to Esther, the Jews slaughtered 75,000 Gentiles in Persia.
On Purim, Dr Baruch Goldstein of Brooklyn and Hebron massacred the devout
Muslims on the Tomb of Abraham. On Purim, the ministers of Germany were executed
in Nuremberg. On Purim, two hundred thousand Iraqis were immolated by the US Air
Force in 1991.
Purim is auspicious, but
Doomsday is even more appropriate for the vengeance on the grand scale, for the
massacre of Messianic proportions.
Soon afterwards, there is the
feast of Succoth, when the Messiah could be revealed.
Just one minute before we
declare Bush as the Antichrist and/or Messiah, there is one circumstance that
calls for investigation. We know now of some inside trading in insurance and
airline shares that imply a previous knowledge of the forthcoming attack. We
know of some advance warnings in the Jewish-owned investment banking system. I
can not imagine a Muslim terrorist who would try and fit the schedule of the
Jewish High Holidays.
Even less I could imagine the
apocalyptic Antichrist and his Jewish Cabbalist advisers buy futures on the
stock exchange. It is easier to seek some bad guys, not necessarily diabolic.
Prudence demands we should account for mundane factors before going to the
celestial ones. That was the preferred method of Father Brown, the hero of G.K.
Chesterton: before applying for a miracle, check material sources.
Indeed, there is no certainty
that President Bush is manipulated by the Jews. Such presumption is based on
idea that there is a non-Jewish United States, 'america stand-alone',
manipulated and subverted by Jews. If it would be the case, by miraculously
excluding the Jews from public discourse, this original America would be
regained. Actually, the recent post-terror discourse in the US is a hesitant
proof to the contrary.
Many American public figures,
Jews and non-Jews alike, called for revenge.
"There is only one way to
begin to deal with people like this, and that is you have to kill some of them
even if they are not immediately directly involved in this thing", said the
former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger[iii], who heads the Jewish
organisation for claims to Germany, at USD 300,000 per annum.
'The response to this
unimaginable 21st-century Pearl Harbor should be as simple as it is swift - kill
the bastards. A gunshot between the eyes, blow them to smithereens, poison them
if you have to. As for cities or
countries that host these worms, bomb them into basketball courts' said Steve
Dunleavy in New York Post[iv]. In Washington Post, Rich Lowry proposed, 'If we
flatten part of Damascus or Tehran or whatever it takes, that is part of the
The best quote goes to Ann
Coulter, 'This is no time to be precious about locating the exact individuals
directly involved in this particular terrorist attack.... We should invade their
countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity (!?). We weren't
punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We
carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war'.
She wrote it in New York Daily News[vi], the newspaper of Mortimer Zuckerman,
the current Head of the Presidents' Conference of American Jewish Organizations.
This vengeful spirit of the
American press is an aberration of the Western discourse. If you sift the world
literature of the Christian and Muslim lands, you would discover that revenge
appears rarely as the main subject of an important book. Nikolai Gogol wrote a
Gothic short story called The Terrible Revenge, Prosper Mérimée wrote a
novelette Colomba on Corsican vendetta. C'est tout. Brits always considered
revenge a very un-English trend, certainly not cricket. 'Vengeful' is a negative
word in every Christian and Muslim culture. The Jewish culture, au contraire, is
saturated with the idea of vengeance, as it draws straight from the Old
Testament, without the redeeming filter of the New Testament or Koran.
We Jews know it better than
anybody. A brilliant American Jewish journalist, John Sack noticed it in his Eye
for Eye, a chilling book about horrible revenge exacted by Jews from the German
civilians after WWII. This book tells of tortures, 'extra-judicial killings',
mass poison and other horrors. You are not likely to get this book, as the
Jewish establishment succeeded to suppress it and keep it out of bookshops.
Not surprisingly, Israel
promoted vengeance into its daily policy. Its attacks on Palestinians were
called peulot tagmul, the acts of vengeance. One of these acts was perpetrated
by the Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 14 of October, 1953, when he and his
soldiers murdered some sixty peasants, women and children in the village of
Qibya. The invasion of Lebanon in 1982 with its 20,000 murdered Lebanese
and Palestinians, Christians and Muslims, was an act of revenge for the attempt
to assassinate Israeli ambassador in London. During last intifada, every act of
Israeli terror is called 'retribution' or 'retaliation' by Israelis and by
American Jewish-owned media.
This Jewish infatuation with
vengeance survived the hazardous crossing of the Atlantic. The American Jews
created Hollywood, and Hollywood made vengeance its main subject. In a way,
American cinema is an expression of the Jewish collective subconscious, and it
was the main factor in creation of the American psyche. From Hollywood,
vengefulness flew all over the earth, and certainly helped to create the world
we inhabit. In other words, there was no need for a conspiracy. Rather immature
America could not withstand the impact of Jewish mentality, and she became a
Jewish State, the big sister of Israel. A grandson of Trier Rabbi, who grew in
the Church, Karl Marx actually prophesied in the 1840s (!) that America will
become a Jewish state, and will embrace the Jewish ideology of greed and
alienation. It explains successes of Jews: it is just natural that in the Jewish
state, Jews succeed more.
This explanation allows us to
answer the question we posted previously, does America support Israel because of
the Jewish lobby or because of the 'true interest of American corporations'. The
answer is, the Jewish lobby is a superfluous body supportive of Israeli
right-wing, while America as a whole is a grander Jewish state with interests
outside the Middle East as well.
This presumption explains away
a lot of queries. It explains incredible 99 per cent vote for support of Israel.
It explains endless Holocaust museums, Holocaust studies and Holocaust films. It
explains centrality of Jews in American life, as now America views world events
from a traditional Jewish position, 'whether it is good for Jews?'
It explains the US walkout at Durban. JW Bush did
not mind to quarrel with Europe and Japan and went back on Kyoto treaty. He did
not give a damn to annoy Russia and China with his unilateral decision to drop
Strategic Arms Treaty. But here he heard His Master's Voice. This haughty
rejection of Africa and Asia, this insulting dismissal of the Afro-American
community, this rejection of the great cause of struggle against racism was an
additional proof that the US became a sister state to Israel.
Recently, President Vladimir
Putin tried to justify his onslaught on Chechens in an interview to Newsweek[vii].
He said, the Chechen leaders 'publicly called for the extermination of Jews',
relegating critics of his war to the ranks of anti-Semites. Now, Chechnya has no
Jews, and Chechen leaders' opinion on Jews would be irrelevant, if anti-Semitism
would still preserve its original meaning, i.e. anti-Jewish prejudice or racism.
In this form, it does not exist anymore, as we proved elsewhere[viii], but the
word received a new meaning. It became an equivalent of anti-Americanism in the
days of McCarthy, or as anti-Sovietism in Brezhnev's Soviet Union.
Whoever rejects new American
paradigm, in America or elsewhere, is an anti-Semite by definition. That is why
good persons of Jewish origin, whether Noam Chomsky or Woody Allen, St Paul or
Karl Marx are called 'anti-Semites'. They are usually rejected by the Jewish
community, but their names are used to defend the structure they attacked.
An offence to the Jewish
community is not considered a form of racism, as ordinary racism is tolerated
with great ease, especially if it is directed towards Arabs (new enemies of
Jews) or Blacks (old enemies of Jews). It is treated as a 'lese majesté' (in
the years of Jewish ascendancy in the Soviet Union (1917 - 1937), people were
shot for an anti-Jewish remark). Manfred Stricker of Strasbourg campaigned to
name the local university after Dr Schweitzer, while the Jewish community
preferred the name of a Jewish scholar with a loose connection to the city. As
the result, Manfred Stricker was sentenced to six months of jail.
While speaking to students in
Harvard, Emory and other Ivy League universities, I noticed that they do not
know the name of Arnold Toynbee.
The greatest British
philosopher of history in 20th century made an error: he spoke of the tragedy of
Palestinians. He also mentioned the African slavery as a tragedy on a par with
the Jewish holocaust. As a result,
he was erased and disappeared from American conscience. This totality of control
over public discourse explains obedience of American (and European)
intellectuals. For an intellectual, it is better to be called a paedophile, but
not an anti-Semite.
In the Jewish American state,
the Jews form its 'Church', its ideological establishment. I feel about this
'church' as Voltaire, who said, "Destroy the infamy" of the Catholic
Church he was born into.
In the Jewish American state,
the Jews are the most successful group of society. This sudden rise to glory and
riches should not be a cause for vertigo and self adulation. Other way around.
Following the line of thought of this great American philosopher, Immanuel
Wallerstein, I shall say: material success in our days is a sign of moral
failure. 'Success' and riches is not a sign of God's benevolence. Anyway, not of
God who blessed the poor. A man who succeeds in the robbers' gang, fails in the
eyes of God. Our world with its starving millions and over-prosperous minority
is immoral and anti-Christian, as anti-Christian as the 'Crusade' of President
mail to P.O.Box 23714 Tel Aviv
61236. Bank details provided by request.